Legal Opinion

Luth v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1982No. Docket 52980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

Plaintiff instituted suit in the Oakland County Circuit Court against defendant, seeking to obtain personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits. Thereafter, plaintiff moved for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(2), contending that defendant had interposed no valid defense. On May 28, 1980, the trial court entered an order granting partial summary judgment in plaintiffs favor. From this order, defendant appeals as of right.

The underlying facts of this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff, an employee of the United States Postal Service, was injured when he was pinned between his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Powell v. Casco Nelmor Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Amoco Production Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Gregory v. Transamerica InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Divito v. Transamerica Corp. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Krygel v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API