Legal Opinion

Krygel v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1984No. Docket 68719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order of summary judgment entered in the Wayne County Circuit Court dismissing his complaint for no-fault benefits.

Plaintiff was injured as a result of an automobile accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment with the Detroit Police Department. Although plaintiff was eligible to receive workers’ compensation benefits, he instead elected to receive charter benefits pursuant to Chapter 21, § 18, of the 1974 Charter of the City of Detroit. The absolute right to elect benefits under the charter was extended to plaintiff as a consequence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Thacker v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Kment v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Krawczyk v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Perkins v. Riverside Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Wesolek v. City of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API