Legal Opinion

Divito v. Transamerica Corp. of America

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1985No. Docket 74662PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

While delivering supplies for his employer, plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident. Defendant provides both no-fault and workers’ compensation coverage for the plaintiffs employer. Plaintiff filed claims for workers’ compensation and no-fault benefits. Pursuant to plaintiffs workers’ compensation claim, defendant voluntarily paid wage-loss benefits for a 12-week period. Defendant then ceased paying workers’ compensation benefits based on a medical opinion from its consulting physician which indicated that plaintiff could return to work. Plaintiff then filed a petition for workers’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Stimson v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Nawrocki v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McFadden v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Cannell v. Riverside InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Cannell v. Riverside InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Gregory v. Transamerica InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gregory v. Transamerica InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API