Gregory v. Transamerica Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.
This case involves the applicability of MCL 500.3109(1); MSA 24.13109(1), the offset provision of the no-fault insurance act, to a redemption agreement of a workers’ compensation claim. The specific question is whether the amount *628of the redemption or the amount of the full workers’ disability benefits for the full period of disability, as if there had been no redemption, shall be subtracted from the amount of the no-fault benefits. We hold that the latter amount is the proper subtraction and that such an agreement of redemption precludes the plaintiff from recovering from the no-fault insurer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Moore v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Morgan v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Joiner v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Conway v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Morgan v. EvansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.