Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Amoco Production Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2003No. Docket 119403, 119410PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

We granted leave to appeal to consider whether plaintiff, a no-fault insurer, is entitled to invoke the doctrine of equitable subrogation in order to receive full reimbursement from defendant, an employer that is self-insured for worker’s compensation, for medical expenses that plaintiff paid on behalf of its insured, an employee of defendant who was injured during the course of his employment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the finding of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (wcac) that plaintiff’s reimbursement was limited by the cost containment rules in the Worker’s Disability…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Auto Club Insurance v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Used Car Factory, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. BJ'S & SONS CONST. CO., INC. v. Van SickleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Adanalic v. Harco National Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Eller v. Metro Industrial Contracting, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Eller v. Metro Industrial Contracting, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Omian v. Chrysler Group LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API