Legal Opinion

Malone v. Clemow

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1931No. Docket No. 7496PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

The three above-entitled actions were consolidated and tried together before the court sitting without a jury, and judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in each case. The appeal is from these three judgments. All the proceedings are included in one record.

Florence Clemow and Floyd Clemow are husband and wife, and are the defendants in all the cases. The plaintiffs in the first case are the father, and the brothers and sisters, of the defendant Florence Clemow. These plaintiffs (in the first case) sue for damages for the death' of Cora Malone, the wife of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ridge v. Boulder Creek Union Junior-Senior High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Sumner v. EdmundsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API