Legal Opinion
Robles v. Chalilpoyil
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 2010No. H033329PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
—Virginia Robles and members of her family filed an action against their former attorneys and appellant Purush Chalilpoyil, alleging negligence and conspiracy to commit fraud. Appellant moved to strike the complaint under the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) law, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (hereafter, section 425.16), but the superior court denied the motion. Appellant seeks review, contending that the conduct on which the complaint is based consists of communications protected by section 425.16. We disagree and affirm the order.
Background
R…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Chodos v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. FaiginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- City of Alhambra v. D'AusilioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Gaynor v. Bulen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Issa v. Applegate, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.