Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Kemp

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 15, 1991No. CR 91-60PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This case involves the constitutionality of Ark. Code Ann. § T6-92-108 (1987), which relates to the legislative limitation of expenses and fees imposed upon court-appointed attorneys for indigent clients accused of crime. We find, under the circumstances of this case, the expense and fee “caps” contained in section 16-92-108 to be unconstitutional and that the contempt citation should be vacated. We remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

On November 30,1990, the appellant, Suzan Jernigan, was charged by information with the capital…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Berna v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. StrayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. PeartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. TouchetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Carle v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API