Legal Opinion
Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 21, 1990No. 90-51PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding an attorney’s fee, under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-308 (Supp. 1989), of only $25,000.00 in a civil action involving breach of contract.
On October 4,1985, the appellant, Lowell Chrisco, executed a sales agency agreement with the appellee, Sun Industries, Inc. (Sun). On January 14, 1988, Sun notified Chrisco that it was cancelling the agreement.
Chrisco filed suit on April 4, 1988, in the Circuit Court of Craighead County alleging that the termination was without proper cause and seeking past…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Damron v. University Estates, Phase II, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Southall v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. StocktonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- New Hampshire Insurance v. QuilantanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
3Cited by211 opinions
- Retro Television Network, Inc. v. Luken Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Sandra Jarrett, - Appellee/ Cross v. Erc Properties, Inc., - Appellant/ CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Arnold v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Dawson v. Temps Plus, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.