Legal Opinion

Carle v. Burnett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1993No. 92-322PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment finding appellant Keith Carle to be in contempt of the Craighead Circuit Court. Carle, an attorney and sole practitioner in Jonesboro, was sentenced to ninety days in jail for a willful refusal to proceed to trial in the case of Helen Cater v. Lee Cater. Carle contends the trial judge erred in three respects: in refusing to recognize substantive error in the order being defied, in sentencing him under its inherent power after trying him under a statutory definition of contempt, and in imposing an excessive punishment. Finding merit only…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arnold v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Fitzhugh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Dennison v. MobleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Meeks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Ivy v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Hodges v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. R.P.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Conlee v. ConleeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API