Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. Strayer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1965No. 19629PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, directing the United States to pay fees and expenses of counsel appointed by the court to represent a prisoner in connection with proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The opinion of the district court, Dillon v. United States, is reported at 230 F.Supp. 487.

The jurisdiction of the district court to enter such a judgment against the United States was asserted under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346. The jurisdiction of this Court over the present appeal rests on 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Edward J. Dillon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat County, State of Washington, and James StarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  3. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hurtado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. In Interest of DBSupreme Court of Florida · 1980

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API