Legal Opinion

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 27, 1952No. C. D. 1423PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

These are protests, consolidated at the trial, against the the collector’s assessment of duty on various articles of merchandise under paragraph 1552 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as smokers’ articles. All of the items were assessed at 60 per centum ad valorem, except those covered by protest No. 162388-K, which were also assessed as smokers’ articles but at 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1552, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802. It is claimed that the articles are dutiable as household utensils at different rates, depending upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  3. United States v. Ellis Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. United States v. DunhillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Baker, Lyman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Bloomingdale Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Cathay Crafts Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API