Legal Opinion

Sittig v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 26, 1913No. 1038PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29796 (T.D. 32830).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Cast iron bowls and cylindrical cast-iron kettles, with flange and rim, imported at the port of Philadelphia, were classified by the collector of customs as hollow ware of iron and assessed for duty at 40 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 158 of the tariff act of 1909, which said paragraph reads as follows:

158. Table, kitchen, and hospital utensils, or other similar hollow ware, of iron or steel, enameled oi glazed with vitreous glasses, but not ornamented or decorated with lithographic or other printing, forty per centum ad valorem.

The importers protested that the goods…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strausky v. ErhardtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Ellis Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API