Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 11, 1912No. 771PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26563 (T. D. 31866).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yries, Judge

Appeal from a decision of the Board of General Appraisers involving two classes of merchandise. The more serious controversy concerns the classification by the collector at the port 6f Chicago of certain imitation bronze statuary. They are made of spelter. The classification for dutiable purposes was there made under the provisions of paragraph 199 of the tariff act of 1909 as a manufacture of metal not specially provided for.

Contention is'made by the importers, who come here as appellants from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers, that the merchandise is properly classifiable for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fisk v. HenarieSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  4. Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ellis Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Pollard Bearings Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API