Milardo v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The named defendant1 Haddam inland wetlands commission appeals from the trial court’s decision reversing the commission’s denial of the plaintiff’s permit application. The commission claims that the trial court improperly found that its denial of the plaintiff’s permit was not supported by substantial evidence. In his cross appeal, the plaintiff claims that, after concluding that the denial of the application was arbitrary, the trial court should have determined whether the evidence supported an order to grant the application. In essence, the plaintiff claims that the court should have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Manatuck Associates v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Forsell v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- United Jewish Center v. Town of BrookfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.