Legal Opinion
Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 3, 2008No. AC 28405PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiffs, John A. Fanotto, Jr., and Anna Fanotto, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the denial by the defendant, the inland wetlands commission of the town of Seymour (commission), of their application for a wetlands permit so that they could build a subdivision on their property. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the court properly concluded that the commission had adequate support for the denial of the application to conduct regulated activities on the property when the uncontroverted expert testimony and reports…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Red 11, LLC v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- River Sound Development, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of the Town of SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- American Institute for Neuro-Integrative development, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- King's Highway Associates v. PLANNING AND ZONING COM'N OF TOWN OF NORTH HAVENConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.