Legal Opinion
Forsell v. Conservation Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 24, 1996No. 14704PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant, the conservation commission of the town of Redding (commission), appeals from the trial court’s decision directing it either to approve the plaintiffs’ inland wetlands applications or to hold additional hearings on the applications. The commission claims that the trial court improperly determined that its denial of the plaintiffs’ applications was not supported by substantial evidence. The plaintiffs filed a cross appeal claiming that the trial court improperly remanded the case to the commission with the option of holding further hearings. We agree with the plaintiffs.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Bain v. Inland Wetlands Commission of OxfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Deangelis v. Iwc, No. Cv 96 132755 (May 16, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Favrow v. Newington, Conservation Comm., No. Cv 01 0507584s (Jan. 22, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Leake v. Commissioner of Consumer Prot., No. Cv98-0061494s (Mar. 25, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.