Zumwalt v. Dickey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Fitzgerald, C.
Action for damages for trespasses alleged to have been committed on the lands described in the complaint, by defendant, who it is alleged wrongfully and unlawfully, and without plaintiffs’ consent, entered thereon the large bands of sheep, and trod down and depastured all of said lands and all the grass and herbage that grew thereon during the years 1888 and 1889, and otherwise injured the same, to the great detriment of plaintiffs, and to their damage in the sum of $910.
*157The complaint further alleges plaintiffs’ title and possession and right of possession to the lands therein…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doll v. MeadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Leviston v.RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Foss v. HinkellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hebbron v. GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hicks v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Whittaker v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Davis v. BlasingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919