Davis v. Blasingame
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor in an action for damages for the alleged trespass of the defendant’s cattle upon the lands of the plaintiff and another, and the consequent depasturing of the same. The complaint contains two causes of action, one relating to the depasturing of the plaintiff’s own lands, and one relating to the depasturing of t'he lands of another who assigned his cause of action to the plaintiff. The defense consists in a denial of the allegations of both counts of the complaint. The evidence educed upon the trial showed that the parties to the action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blevins v. MullallyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Triscony v. BrandensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Hicks v. ButterworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Hahn v. GarrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Zumwalt v. DickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Herzberg v. County of PlumasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Shively v. Dye Creek Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Williams v. GoodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Chism v. MajorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Yraceburn v. CapeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923