Legal Opinion

Foss v. Hinkell

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1889No. 12673PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

— Ejectment. Judgment for plaintiffs, and appeal by defendant from judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial.

The plaintiffs claimed title under a patent from the United States of the land in suit to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, dated the 4th of April, 1879, and a deed of the company, of date of the 20th of June, 1887, conveying this land to them.

The defendant is a duly qualified pre-emptor, having entered into and held possession of the land in suit since the 22d of April, 1886, and ever since that day has been a bona fide pre-emption settler thereon. On the tenth day of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doolan v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Power v. SlaMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Johnson v. DrewSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  4. Whittaker v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Janes v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API