Legal Opinion
Whittaker v. Otto
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1967No. Civ. 8079PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.
Action for general and punitive damages for trespass upon a mining claim and conversion of a quantity of iron ore. Prom an adverse judgment of the Superior Court in and for the County of Inyo, plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. The attempted appeal from the order denying a motion for a new trial should be dismissed as being from a nonappealable order.
The mining claims which are the subject of the present controversy lie some seventeen or eighteen miles north of Trona in the Argus Mountains near the Panamint Valley, Inyo County, California. They were originally patented in 1911, and recorded…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. Cap Concrete, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Williams v. GoodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Wilson v. Brand S Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- United States v. Marin Rock and Asphalt CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.