Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Twin City Club

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1963No. 399PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

Defendants make two assignments of error. The first is not brought -forward -and 'discussed in the brief, and it is therefore deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 810; Power Co. v. Currie, Commissioner of Revenue, 254 N.C. 17, 118 S.E. 2d 155. The second assignment of error presents only the question whether the facts found by the Commissioner are sufficient to support the award of compensation. Glace v. Throwing Co., 239 N.C. 668, 80 S.E. 2d 759; Worsley v. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E. 2d 467.

To be compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Allred v. Allred-Gardner, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Holley v. Acts, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Harless v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API