Legal Opinion

Ridout v. Rose's 5-10-25c Stores

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1933PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Tbe 'Workmen’s Compensation Law defines “injury” and “personal injury” as injury by accident arising out of and iii tlie course of tbe employment — tbe words “out of” referring to tbe origin or cause* of tbe accident and tbe words “in tbe course of” to' tbe time, place and circumstances under wbicb tbe accident occurred. Compensation Law, sec. 2(f) ; Conrad v. Foundry Co., 198 N. C., 723. Whether tbe accident-complained of arose out of and in tbe course of the employment is a mixed question of law and fact (Harden v. Furniture Co., 199 N. C., 733); but tbe facts as found by tbe Commission,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Dependents of Phifer v. Foremost Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Bryson v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Johnson v. Charlotte Bagging Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Hildebrand v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Wilson v. . MooresvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Plemmons v. . White's Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API