Legal Opinion

Hunt v. . State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1931PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

By the terms of the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act compensation may be paid to an employee or in case of his death to his dependents or legal representatives for personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. Code, 1931, sec. 8081 (i), (b), (f), (j), (k). We have said in previous decisions that it is not easy to give the phrase “out of and in the course of the employment” an accurate definition within which all facts calling for an application of the provisions of the act may be embraced. Obviously the terms are not synonymous; probably the one was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Dependents of Phifer v. Foremost Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Wilkie v. . StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Kinsman v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Hollowell v. North Carolina Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Hardy v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Royster v. Culp, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API