Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
*266Plaintiffs Marline Petitpas1 and Joseph Petitpas sued Ford Motor Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Rossmoor Corporation,2 and others, alleging that exposure to asbestos caused by these defendants resulted in Marline's mesothelioma. Motions for summary adjudication were granted before trial, narrowing the claims against Exxon and Ford. During trial, the court granted nonsuit for Rossmoor. The jury returned defense verdicts for Exxon and Ford.
Plaintiffs assert five contentions on appeal. First, they argue that the trial court erred by granting summary adjudication in favor of Exxon as to strict…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Johnson v. Rush Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Little v. Law Office of Dominic Trutanich CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Lopez v. The Hillshire Brands Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.