Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Rush Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 11, 2023No. 1:19-cv-00105Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM LEE JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00105-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT PAPE TRUCKS INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 13 v. JUDGMENT 14 RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., (ECF Nos. 106, 107, 108, 109, 111) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 I. 21 INTRODUCTION 22 This is a California state law product liability action1 arising out of the personal injuries 23 sustained by Plaintiff William Johnson (“William”) on December 21, 2018, as a result of an 24 explosion that occurred during the refueling of a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.