Legal Opinion

Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 13, 2018No. E066267PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIREZ P. J.

*57When a settlement agreement provides that the "[p]laintiffs and their counsel agree" to keep the terms of the agreement confidential, and when the plaintiffs' counsel signs the agreement under the words, "Approved as to form and content," can the plaintiffs' counsel be liable to the defendant for breach of the confidentiality provision? We answer this question, "No."

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. The Settlement Agreement .

Richard Fournier and Wendy Crossland (collectively the Fourniers) filed an action (the Fournier case) against Monster Energy Company (Monster) and a related defendant.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. LindbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. GoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monster Energy Company v. SchechterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Charlotte B Milliner v. Mutual Securities, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  3. Charlotte B Milliner v. Mutual Securities, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API