Hoover v. Welsh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
This appeal is taken from a pre-trial Order permitting counsel for appellee to interview ex parte a physician with whom appellant, Mrs. Hoover, had consulted. Appellants now challenge this Order on the basis that it violates the physician/patient privilege.
*104Appellee1 filed a Motion requesting the trial court to rule on the propriety of conducting ex parte communications with a Dr. Lowry. Appellant, Mrs. Hoover, consulted with this physician to discuss the viability of injections which would enable her voice to return to near normalcy after her vocal cord had been paralyzed as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Handwriting Exemplar of CasaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Silver v. DownsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. JelligCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re Handwriting Exemplar of CasaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Augelletta v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Redevelopment Authority of Cambria County v. International Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. BristerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Borough of Mifflinburg v. HeimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Herb v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.