Herb v. Snyder
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether, after two years of docket inactivity, on motion of a defendant, the trial court may properly enter a judgment of non pros where the defendant has failed to take any action to advance the listing or re-listing for argument of his preliminary objections. Because a delay caused by a defendant or properly chargeable to a defendant cannot be a ground for the entry of a judgment of non pros against a plaintiff, we hold that the trial court properly denied the motions for the entry of a judgment of non pros. Accordingly, we affirm.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Pennridge Electric, Inc. v. Souderton Area Joint School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re Handwriting Exemplar of CasaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- POLUKA v. ColeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of the Art Medical Products, Inc. v. Aries Medical, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Matusow v. ZiegerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Doyle v. TesauroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Kensey v. KenseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.