Legal Opinion

Borough of Mifflinburg v. Heim

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1997PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

These consolidated appeals are from the orders entered September 25, 1996, which granted Summary Judgment in favor of ap-pellees, the Borough of Mifflinbúrg and Walter Rafacz, Vd/b/a Technical Services Company. We affirm.

Appellant is the owner of a hotel/restaurant, the Scarlet “D,” (hereinafter “the restaurant”) located in the Borough of Mifflin-burg. Mifflinbúrg provides electricity for all residents and businesses within its borders. In October of 1988, appellant arranged for the re-classification of the restaurant’s electricity usage from “commercial” status to “GLP-2”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hayward v. Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Kingston Coal Co. v. Felton Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Estate of LakatoshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Ingenito v. AC & S, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Creazzo v. Medtronic, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Ellenbogen v. PNC Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Todd Heller, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Pace v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API