Borough of Mifflinburg v. Heim
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
These consolidated appeals are from the orders entered September 25, 1996, which granted Summary Judgment in favor of ap-pellees, the Borough of Mifflinbúrg and Walter Rafacz, Vd/b/a Technical Services Company. We affirm.
Appellant is the owner of a hotel/restaurant, the Scarlet “D,” (hereinafter “the restaurant”) located in the Borough of Mifflin-burg. Mifflinbúrg provides electricity for all residents and businesses within its borders. In October of 1988, appellant arranged for the re-classification of the restaurant’s electricity usage from “commercial” status to “GLP-2”…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hayward v. Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kingston Coal Co. v. Felton Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Estate of LakatoshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Ingenito v. AC & S, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Creazzo v. Medtronic, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Ellenbogen v. PNC Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Todd Heller, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Pace v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.