Legal Opinion

In Re Handwriting Exemplar of Casale

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1985No. 2250 Philadelphia 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order compelling appellant to appear at the office of the assistant district attorney and submit a handwriting exemplar. Appellant argues that the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter the order because at the time the order was entered appellant had not been arrested and no charges had been filed against him, and the order was not incident to a grand jury investigation. Cf. Commonwealth v. Polak, 438 Pa. 67, 263 A.2d 354 (1970) (under Act of June 16, 1836, P.L. 784, 17 P.S. § 2079, court had power to issue subpoena only if there was some…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re: Petition of Arlen SpecterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. PolakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Carabello AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. United States v. William W. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BristerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Hoover v. WelshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Herb v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Ben v. Schwartz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API