Legal Opinion
In Re Handwriting Exemplar of Casale
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 17, 1986No. 69 Middle District, Appeal Docket, 1985PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
By allowance, Neil Casale (appellant), appeals an order of Superior Court quashing, as interlocutory, his appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County. In response to a motion filed “ex proprio motu”, i.e. “of his own accord”, by the District Attorney of Lycoming County, Common Pleas issued a rule to show cause and then ordered appellant to appear at the office of the District Attorney for the purpose of submitting to a handwriting exemplar examination as requested by the Commonwealth. Because appellant raises a question of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Blackwell v. Com., State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.