Legal Opinion

Wasikowski v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

All issues on the appeal are subsidiary to the action of the learned trial court in determining, notwithstanding the verdict, that plaintiff Paul Wasikowski was guilty of causal negligence in equal degree with the defendant railroad. Ordinarily the existence of negligence and the comparison of the negligence of adverse parties are questions for the jury. Cameron v. Union Automobile Ins. Co. (1933), 210 Wis. 659, 246 N. W. 420, 247 N. W. 453. When it appears as a matter of law that the negligence of the plaintiff is as great or greater than that of the defendant it is the duty of the court to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollard v. TobinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gundlach v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Cameron v. Union Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Peters v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ceplina v. South Milwaukee School BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. McCauley v. International Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Murawski v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Schneider Fuel & Supply Co. v. Thomas H. Bentley & Son, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API