Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Tobin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 7, 1933 :

Fowler, J.

The bank claims (1) that the bonds are negotiable and (2) that under the evidence they are holders thereof in due course and entitled to enforce them against the maker.(1) The bonds are payable to bearer, and each is an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money, unless the provision below quoted renders the amount uncertain. Sec. 116.02, Stats. The provision, the clauses of which are numbered for convenience, is as follows : “ (1) to which deed of trust reference is hereby made with the same effect as though recited at length…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Kottka v. PPG Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Schulz v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Cogger v. TrudellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API