Schneider Fuel & Supply Co. v. Thomas H. Bentley & Son, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Defendant maintains that the complaint does not sufficiently allege a cause of action for attractive nuisance; and, that its negligence, if any, is superseded by an independent, intervening force.
The plaintiff concedes that the complaint does not state a cause of action for attractive nuisance as that phrase is legally understood, but contends the allegation of attractive nuisance is merely descriptive of a negligent act of the defendant.
The allegation of attractive nuisance here may be descriptive, but it does not enlighten us as to the facts in this case. It is clear that there is no…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Alsteen v. GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Strahlendorf v. Walgreen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Angelier v. Red Star Yeast & Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart v. WulfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Purtell v. TehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Ruff v. BurgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Tift v. Forage King Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.