Legal Opinion
Peters v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The sole question for determination here is whether the negligence of the deceased was equal to or greater than that of the defendant. In the decision made in response to motions after verdict, the trial court correctly analyzed the case. It said:
“My view of the case is that the deceased was on one side of the railroad track and his cattle were on the other. In order to protect his cattle he tried to get across h> their side and failed. Or if this is not correct, then he attempted to cross the tracks without first looking for oncoming cars. If he saw the car coming and attempted to' cross the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zenner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Waitkus v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Kilcoyne v. TrauschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Hustad v. EvettsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Lese v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Skybrock v. Concrete Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Keegan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Leckwee v. GibsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.