Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Union Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*662The following opinion was filed January 10, 1933 :

Fowler, J.

The appellants contend that the judgment of the circuit court is erroneous because (1) as matter of law the defendant county did not leave the truck standing on the road; (2) the Comparative Negligence Statute does not apply; (3) the parking statute does not apply; (4) evidence was erroneously received over defendants’ objection; (5) the deceased assumed the risk; (6) the statute allowing damages for loss of society is unconstitutional; (7) if the statute is valid, allowance in the instant case of the full amount allowable is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Koerber v. PatekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McGuiggan v. HillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Brown v. HaertelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Kottka v. PPG Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Schulz v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Cogger v. TrudellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API