Murawski v. Brown
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Did the trial court err in failing to grant appellant’s motion for a directed verdict; and(2) Are the damages excessive ?
Question of directed verdict.
A verdict should only be directed against a plaintiff where plaintiff’s evidence, giving it the most favorable construction it will reasonably bear, is insufficient to sustain a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Wallow v. Zupan (1967), 35 Wis. 2d 195, 150 N. W. 2d 329; Baumgarten v. Jones (1963), 21 Wis. 2d 467, 124 N. W. 2d 609.
The central issue in this case is whether or not the railroad had a duty to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Baumgarten v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Gundlach v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Hendley v. Chicago & Nortwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Schmidt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peters v. Menard, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Kobelinski v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Karl v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Losinski v. County of TrempealeauCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Koele v. RadueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.