A. Hamburger & Sons, Inc. v. Lemboeck
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DESMOND, J., pro tem.
In this case the plaintiff, owner of a parcel of real estate fronting in a general southerly direction upon Exposition Boulevard in the city of Los Angeles, sought to have the court recognize by its decree certain easements claimed to exist in and over another parcel, owned by the defendants, adjoining the plaintiff’s land at the rear, and fronting upon Thirty-seventh Place. The court was asked to enjoin the defendants from maintaining upon their own land, this second parcel, a six-foot board fence which had been erected immediately adjacent to the holdings of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Prouty v. DevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Quinlan v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Grimmesey v. KirtlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Kytasty v. GodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Fischer v. HendlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942