Legal Opinion

Piazza v. Schaefer

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1967No. Civ. 23260PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

This is an appeal by Joseph B. Schaefer and Margaret Terry Schaefer from a judgment of the superior court in Sonoma County, a portion of which declared that appellants’ lands were subject to an implied easement in favor of respondents Joseph P. Piazza, Jr., Lena Piazza, Ralph C. Hardisty and Jeannette Hardisty. The implied easement found entitles respondents to maintain a pipeline across appellants’ lands to take water for domestic purposes from a lake on the Schaefer property.

• We attach to our opinion a copy of appellants’ Exhibit B-7, a diagram helpful in understanding the location of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Jersey Farm Co. v. Atlanta Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Rubio Cañon Land & Water Ass'n v. EverettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Grimmesey v. KirtlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Silveira v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Association of Apartment Owners of Wailea Elua v. Wailea Resort Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lacy v. SeegersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Pochinski Realty Associates v. PuzioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. Sierra Screw Products v. Azusa Greens, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API