Legal Opinion

Buck v. Buck

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1954No. Civ. 20136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying the motion to vacate her default and to set aside the ensuing decree of annulment.

The parties intermarried on July 31, 1952, and less than two months thereafter, on September 16, defendant husband herein filed an action for annulment on the ground that at all times after the marriage ceremony plaintiff herein refused to consummate said marriage or to live and cohabit with defendant as husband and wife. A reconciliation was effected about October 1, 1952, and the parties again lived together for about 10 days when another separation occurred…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stout v. BakkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Kesselman v. KesselmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Benito v. BenitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Border v. KuznetzAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
  5. Fayad v. FayadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API