Legal Opinion

Kesselman v. Kesselman

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1963No. Civ. 26090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.

In this divorce action, plaintiff (wife) appeals from an order granting defendant's motion to set aside his default. Defendant appeals from an order that he pay $1,500 as attorney’s fees to plaintiff’s attorney for services in resisting the motion.

On August 22, 1958, the parties made an antenuptial agreement which provided, in part, that each one should continue to own his or her separate property as separate property, and that money or other property received during marriage for services rendered should be the separate property of the one rendering the services.

They were married on August…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Couser v. CouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Buck v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Fayad v. FayadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API