Legal Opinion

Frericks v. Sorensen

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1952No. Civ. 19118PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

The property in controversy in this action is a parcel of land 50.5 feet by 66 feet, being a part of Lot 111, tract 1,000 in the county of Los Angeles. Plaintiffs claimed title by reason of facts to be hereinafter related and also asserted a prescriptive title. They prevailed and defendants appeal.

Lot 111 is bounded on the north by Albers Street, on the west by Sunnyslope Avenue, and on the south by Chandler Boulevard, although the south 50.5 feet are included in the boulevard. Inclusive of this 50.5 feet, Lot 111 is 645.83 feet in length.

The court found the following facts: (1) On February…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Grants Pass Land & Water Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Paurley v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Winchell v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Roman v. RiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API