Winchell v. Lambert
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Defendants have appealed from a judgment quieting plaintiffs’ title to portions of Lot A and Lot 204. The following is a summary of the uncontroverted evidence. Appellants are the owners of Lot 285, which is in the shape of a triangle, on the west 115.43 feet along the street, on the south 115.73 feet at right angles to the street, and on the northeast the hypotenuse 163.46 feet along the southwest line of respondents’ Lot A. Said Lot A extends beyond both the north and the southeast extremities of Lot 285.
Since 1938 appellants have lived in the house on Lot 285. Two triangular portions of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Johndrow v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Moore v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Safwenberg v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Vieira Enterprises, Inc. v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.