Legal Opinion

Roman v. Ries

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1968No. Civ. 24256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants in a quiet title action which established a boundary line between their respective properties.

The facts, which are correctly stated in plaintiffs’ brief, appear as follows. In May of 1959, defendants purchased land which presently adjoins plaintiffs’ property. At that time plaintiffs’ land was owned by Onni Reinikainen. When defendants purchased the property they did not know where the boundary line between the two properties was located. A month to three months after purchasing the land defendant A. B. Ries had a conversation…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Custom Craft Carpets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Hilburn v. BrodheadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Oceanside Community Assn. v. Oceanside Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. MacFarlane v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Minson Co. v. Aviation FinanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API