Hutson v. the Owl Drug Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
This is an action for damages for alleged violation of section 51 of the Civil Code relating to personal rights and for assault and battery. The judgment-roll only is before the court.
Appellant bases its appeal upon the following specifications: 1. That the findings of fact show clearly that the defendant was not responsible for the assault found to have been committed; 2. That the findings of fact do not show a violation by the defendant of the plaintiffs’ civil rights; 3. That the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was erroneously overruled.
As to the first…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alexander v. Central Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Rooney v. Gray Bros.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Mallory v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Foerst v. KelsoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Angelucci v. Century Supper ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Koire v. Metro Car WashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Stearns v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Gardner v. Vic Tanny Compton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Osborne v. YasmehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.