Legal Opinion

Mallory v. Thomas

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1893No. 15041PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for an alleged trespass and destruction of certain property, and set forth in her complaint the trespass of the defendant in entering upon her premises, charging that the defendant “tore down the ceiling overhead, a partition wall, the plastering on the front of said building, and caused great damage to plaintiff’s goods and business, and rendered said premises unfit for the uses and purposes of plaintiff’s business, and thereby broke up and destroyed said business of ^plaintiff”; and also alleging that the same was done in a threatening…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Reynolds v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Stark v. WellmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Alexander v. Central Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rooney v. Gray Bros.California Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Avakian v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hutson v. the Owl Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API