Angelucci v. Century Supper Club
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
We granted review in the present case to determine whether, in order to state a claim under Civil Code section 52, subdivision (a), the relevant remedial provision of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.; also hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Act), plaintiffs must demonstrate that they affirmatively requested nondiscriminatory treatment and were refused.1
As we shall explain, we conclude that the text of the Act does not support defendant’s and the Court of Appeal’s assertion that, in order to recover under the Act, plaintiffs who are discriminated…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Vogel v. Rite Aid Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Munson v. Del Taco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Buckland v. Threshold Enterprises, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2007
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.