Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Yasmeh

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2016No. B262043; B265530PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLLINS, J.—

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs John Flowers, Rebecca Osborne, Seth Messmer, and Kody Messmer (collectively, plaintiffs) allege that they visited a hotel owned and managed by defendants Bruce Yasmeh, Alfred Yasmeh, American Property Management, and INE Capital Holdings. Flowers is paraplegic and employs the use of a service dog. Osborne is Flowers’s wife, and the Messmers are Flowers’s stepsons. Plaintiffs allege that they visited defendants’ hotel, but management refused to rent them a room unless they first paid a nonrefundable cleaning fee relating to the dog. They allege that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Munson v. Del Taco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. White v. Square, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Gilbert v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. Kim v. Reins Internat. Cal., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Liapes v. Facebook, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Our Peculiar Family v. Inspire Charter SchoolsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API