Truett v. Onderdonk
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City the cau.se for trial and directing the entry of judgment. J. M, Seawetl, Judge. and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing to set The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
This action was commenced on March 18, 1880, in the superior court .of the city and county of San Eranpisco, to secure an accounting and winding up of the affairs of a *582partnership alleged to exist between the parties as contractors for the construction of seawalls, grading of railroads, filling in, extension, and widening of streets, and works.of a'similar chair.', acter—the complaint specifying in detail a large number of contracts for work of the character indicated as being in a state of completion or partial completion by said partnership, and alleging that a large sum of money was due…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Robinson v. Exempt Fire Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Acock v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Heller v. Dyerville Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by57 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Kerrigan v. O'MearaMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.